Correlation between free-field cortical auditory evoked potentials and behavioral audiometry thresholds in pediatric patients with hearing aids or cochlear implants

OBJECTIVES: To determine the correlation between hearing thresholds obtained using free-field Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEPs) and behavioral audiometry in children with sensorineural hearing loss after hearing-aids or cochlear-implant intervention, and to determine whether P1 latency and N1-P1 inter-peak amplitude can be used to assess hearing device outcome in young children.

Continue reading at PubMed

✦ The floor

Discussion

Signed responses from readers of the wire.

✦ Clinical Takeaway ✦

If the correlation is strong, free-field cortical auditory evoked potentials could serve as an objective cross-check for behavioral thresholds in pediatric hearing device fittings, but await full results before changing fitting protocols.

✦ Why It Matters ✦

Objective threshold estimation in young children who cannot reliably complete behavioral audiometry is a long-standing clinical challenge; a validated evoked-potential correlate could improve device fitting accuracy.

✦ Key Points ✦

01Study compares free-field cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) thresholds to behavioral audiometry thresholds in children.
02Participants were fitted with either hearing aids or cochlear implants.
03Objective measures like CAEPs are valuable when behavioral testing is unreliable or impossible in young children.
04Findings could inform more accurate audiological device fitting in pediatric populations.
05Published in the Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (BJORL).

✦ Claims & Evidence ✦

ClaimEvidenceSupport

Free-field cortical auditory evoked potential thresholds correlate with behavioral audiometry thresholds in pediatric hearing device users.

studyunclear

✦ Research metadata ✦

PMID: 42981830
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2026.101922.
Journal: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Publication type: research_article
Evidence level: 4
Population: Pediatric patients fitted with hearing aids or cochlear implants
Intervention: Free-field cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) threshold measurement
Comparator: Behavioral audiometry thresholds

Primary outcomes

Correlation between CAEP thresholds and behavioral audiometry thresholds

✦ Related stories ✦

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·3w ago

Associations Among Parental Anxiety, Family Rehabilitation Participation, and Auditory-Language Outcomes in Preschool Children Using Hearing Aids or Cochlear Implants

Audiologists fitting hearing aids or cochlear implants in young children should routinely screen for parental anxiety, as it may negatively affect family participation in rehabilitation and device use, which are known drivers of auditory-language outcomes.

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·5mo ago

Early Auditory Stimulation, Not Device Type: Comparable Cortical Maturation in Children Using Cochlear Implants or Hearing Aids

Prioritise early auditory stimulation regardless of device type — timing of intervention appears more important than the choice between cochlear implant and hearing aid for cortical auditory maturation.

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·6w ago

Identifying delays via preschool language scales in children who are deaf/hard-of-hearing and use spoken language

Audiologists and speech-language pathologists should critically evaluate whether standard preschool language scales are sensitive enough to detect delays in deaf/hard-of-hearing speaking children, and consider supplementing them with additional assessment tools.

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·5mo ago

Quantifying Inner Ear Function in Children With a Diagnosis of Cancer: Assessment of Vestibular and Audiometric Function

Audiologists and oncology teams caring for pediatric cancer patients should routinely screen for vestibular impairment alongside audiometric monitoring, as this study suggests vestibular damage is an under-detected late effect of cancer treatment in children.

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·3mo ago

Barriers to Timely Infant Hearing Loss Diagnosis Utilizing Auditory Brainstem Response

Audiologists and clinic administrators in under-resourced health systems should review their referral-to-ABR workflows and actively address identified barriers — such as appointment availability, geographic access, and caregiver navigation support — to reduce diagnostic delays...

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·4w ago

Progressive Hearing Loss in Childhood - A Prognostic Factor Systematic Review

Audiologists monitoring children with hearing loss should factor in identified prognostic markers (e.g., aetiology, genetics) when planning surveillance schedules, though specific clinical protocols will depend on individual guideline updates informed by this evidence synthesis.

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·5mo ago

Ototoxicity Associated with Antineoplastic Agents in the Pediatric Population: An Evidence-Based Review of Auditory Monitoring Strategies and Contemporary Diagnostic Frameworks-Narrative Review

Audiologists managing pediatric oncology patients should apply evidence-based auditory monitoring protocols aligned with current diagnostic frameworks for platinum-based chemotherapy ototoxicity; this review consolidates existing guidance but does not introduce new...

PubMed·Journal article·Pediatric·7w ago

Development of the Children's English and Spanish Speech Recognition Test: Sound Field Data From Children With and Without Hearing Loss

Audiologists who test bilingual English-Spanish speaking children should be aware of this new validated tool, but should wait for broader normative data and independent replication before adopting it as a primary clinical measure.