: The present study aimed to compare cortical auditory maturation, as reflected by P1 latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs), in children with congenital severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss rehabilitated with unilateral cochlear implants (CIs) or bilateral conventional hearing aids (HAs).
Prioritise early auditory stimulation regardless of device type — timing of intervention appears more important than the choice between cochlear implant and hearing aid for cortical auditory maturation.
This challenges device-centric thinking in paediatric hearing care and strengthens the evidence base for early intervention programmes across both CI and HA pathways.
- 01Early timing of auditory stimulation, not device type, drives cortical auditory maturation in children with congenital severe-to-profound hearing loss.
- 02Outcome measure was P1 latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs), an objective marker of auditory brain development.
- 03Findings apply to children using either cochlear implants or conventional hearing aids.
- 04Results support early identification and fitting as the primary clinical priority.
- 05Comparative design strengthens internal validity relative to single-device observational studies.
Cortical auditory maturation (P1 latency) is comparable in children with cochlear implants and hearing aids when stimulation timing is equivalent.
studysupportedEarly auditory stimulation timing is more important than device type for cortical maturation outcomes.
studysupported- PMID
- 42194183
- DOI
- 10.3390/children13050657.
- Journal
- Children
- Publication type
- research_article
- Evidence level
- 2b
- Population
- Children with congenital severe-to-profound hearing loss using cochlear implants or hearing aids
- Intervention
- Cochlear implant use with early auditory stimulation
- Comparator
- Hearing aid use with equivalent early auditory stimulation
Primary outcomes
P1 latency of cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) as a marker of cortical auditory maturation