The government says non-compete clauses drag down wages and handcuff workers. Image: Tanaonte/stock.adobe.com. Proposed federal laws banning non-compete clauses for workers earning less than $190,100 could have significant ramifications for hearing care practitioners and audiology practices....
Continue reading at Hearing Practitioner Australia
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
No actionable change to clinical practice — this is a proposed employment law reform; clinic owners and employed audiologists in Australia should seek legal advice to understand potential contract implications if the legislation passes.
Removing non-compete restrictions for the majority of audiology workers could increase staff mobility, intensify competition for talent, and alter the competitive dynamics of hearing clinic ownership in Australia.
- 01Proposed Australian legislation would ban non-compete clauses for workers earning under $190,100 AUD.
- 02Most audiologists and hearing care practitioners fall below this salary threshold.
- 03If passed, audiologists could more freely change employers or establish competing clinics.
- 04The reform could increase staff turnover pressures and reshape workforce planning for clinic owners.
- 05Legislation is still at proposal stage — no enactment date confirmed.
The proposed ban on non-compete clauses applies to Australian workers earning under $190,100, which would cover most audiologists.
press releasepartially supportedRemoving non-compete clauses would significantly affect employment conditions for audiologists and hearing care practitioners.
opinionunclear