OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical outcomes and temporal bone remodeling after venous sinus stenting for pulsatile tinnitus (PT), and to compare remodeling rates between isolated sigmoid sinus wall dehiscence (SSWD) and diverticulum-associated SSWD.
Clinicians managing pulsatile tinnitus with venous sinus stenting should be aware that the type of structural abnormality — isolated dehiscence versus diverticulum — is associated with different rates of post-stenting temporal bone remodeling, which may inform procedural planning and follow-up imaging schedules.
As venous sinus stenting gains traction as a treatment for pulsatile tinnitus, understanding how underlying anatomy shapes bone remodeling outcomes is essential for refining patient selection and post-operative monitoring.
- 01Study evaluated temporal bone remodeling after venous sinus stenting for pulsatile tinnitus.
- 02Two anatomical subtypes compared: isolated sigmoid sinus dehiscence vs. sigmoid sinus diverticulum.
- 03Remodeling rates differed between the two structural subtypes post-stenting.
- 04Published ahead of print in European Radiology (2026).
- 05Findings may guide radiological follow-up protocols after stenting procedures.
Temporal bone remodeling rates after venous sinus stenting differ between patients with isolated sigmoid sinus dehiscence and those with sigmoid sinus diverticulum.
studypartially supportedVenous sinus stenting produces measurable temporal bone remodeling in patients treated for pulsatile tinnitus.
studysupported- PMID
- 42363966
- DOI
- 10.1007/s00330-026-12711-4.
- Journal
- European Radiology
- Publication type
- research_article
- Evidence level
- 2b
- Population
- Patients with pulsatile tinnitus who underwent venous sinus stenting, stratified by isolated sigmoid sinus dehiscence or diverticulum
- Intervention
- Venous sinus stenting for pulsatile tinnitus
- Comparator
- Comparison between isolated sigmoid sinus dehiscence and sigmoid sinus diverticulum subgroups
Primary outcomes
Rate of temporal bone remodeling post-stenting; Clinical outcomes after venous sinus stenting