electrophysiological markers are often proposed for speech-in-noise assessment, but their validation targets are not always explicit: a marker may calibrate with intelligibility, distinguish acoustic conditions, decode attention, or predict an individual speech reception threshold (SRT). We used three public MEG/EEG datasets to test these endpoints within one validation framework....
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
Cortical speech tracking shows promise as an objective speech-in-noise marker, but boundary conditions identified across three datasets mean it is not yet ready for routine clinical use; researchers should note the benchmark parameters before designing new studies.
A validated objective measure of speech-in-noise ability would transform audiological assessment, especially for populations who cannot complete traditional behavioral tests, making this benchmark work a key methodological stepping stone.
- 01Benchmarks cortical speech tracking (brain-following-speech signal) as an objective speech-in-noise test across three independent datasets.
- 02Uses both MEG (magnetic brain imaging) and EEG (electrical brain imaging) to assess generalizability of the marker.
- 03Identifies specific boundary conditions—signal parameters that must be met for the measure to work reliably.
- 04Objective speech-in-noise markers could one day benefit patients unable to complete behavioral audiometry.
- 05Published in Hearing Research, a leading peer-reviewed auditory science journal.
Cortical speech tracking can serve as an objective electrophysiological marker for speech-in-noise perception.
studypartially supportedThe reliability of cortical speech tracking as a speech-in-noise marker depends on specific boundary conditions.
studysupported- PMID
- 42805137
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.heares.2026.109816.
- Journal
- Hearing Research
- Publication type
- research_article
- Evidence level
- 2b
- Population
- Participants assessed for speech-in-noise perception across three MEG/EEG datasets
- Intervention
- Cortical speech tracking measured via MEG and EEG
- Comparator
- Behavioral speech-in-noise assessment
Primary outcomes
Reliability and boundary conditions of cortical speech tracking as an objective speech-in-noise marker; Consistency of results across three independent datasets