To map the technological evolution and clinical feasibility of robotic systems in neurotologic and lateral skull-base surgery, identifying bottlenecks limiting widespread clinical translation. DATABASES REVIEWED: A systematic search was conducted across Embase, Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. REVIEW
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
No actionable change yet — robotic neurotologic surgery remains investigational; audiologists and surgeons should monitor the field but no current clinical pathway changes are warranted.
As robotic-assisted surgery moves closer to routine use in otology and skull-base procedures, audiologists involved in surgical co-management need to understand both the potential benefits and the current adoption barriers.
- 01Scoping review in Otology & Neurotology maps robotic system development across neurotologic and skull-base surgery.
- 02Robots show technological feasibility for procedures such as cochlear implantation and lateral skull-base tumor removal.
- 03Key adoption barriers include cost, regulatory hurdles, limited haptic feedback, and steep learning curves.
- 04No large RCTs or high-quality comparative trials in this space yet identified.
- 05Review is descriptive/mapping in nature; does not pool outcomes or perform meta-analysis.
Robotic systems are clinically feasible for neurotologic and lateral skull-base surgery.
studypartially supportedBarriers to widespread adoption of robotic neurotologic surgery exist and have been identified.
studysupported- PMID
- 42929200
- DOI
- 10.1097/MAO.0000000000005044.
- Journal
- Otology & Neurotology
- Publication type
- review
- Evidence level
- 2a
- Population
- Published studies on robotic-assisted neurotologic and lateral skull-base surgical procedures
- Intervention
- Robotic surgical systems applied to neurotologic and lateral skull-base surgery
Primary outcomes
Technological evolution of robotic systems in neurotology; Clinical feasibility of robotic-assisted neurotologic procedures; Barriers to widespread clinical adoption