Journal article · Vestibular← The news desk

✦ The Dispatch

The Landscape of Vestibular Schwannoma Microsurgical Resection Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review

A dispatch from PubMed — filed

We sought to analyze contemporary clinical trials since 2010 involving vestibular schwannoma (VS) patients undergoing microsurgical resection to characterize the landscape of trial outcomes studied, as well as the representation of recruited participants by sex, race, and ethnicity. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science.

Clinical Takeaway

This scoping review maps the clinical trial landscape for vestibular schwannoma surgery but does not yet provide new outcome data; clinicians should watch for future systematic reviews or pooled analyses that may follow from this groundwork.

Why It Matters

Identifying gaps and inconsistencies in vestibular schwannoma surgical trial design can guide more standardized, higher-quality future research that could eventually change surgical practice.

Key Points
  1. 01Scoping review covers clinical trials on vestibular schwannoma microsurgery published since 2010.
  2. 02Published in Otology & Neurotology (PMID 42083075, DOI 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004932).
  3. 03Characterizes the research landscape rather than synthesizing efficacy outcomes.
  4. 04Likely highlights heterogeneity in outcome measures and trial designs.
  5. 05Identifies where standardization and further clinical trials are needed.
Claims & Evidence

The scoping review characterizes the landscape of clinical trials on microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma since 2010.

studysupported
Research metadata
PMID
42083075
DOI
10.1097/MAO.0000000000004932.
Journal
Otology & Neurotology
Publication type
review
Evidence level
2a
Population
Clinical trials involving patients undergoing microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma
Intervention
Microsurgical resection of vestibular schwannoma

Primary outcomes

Characterization of clinical trial landscape since 2010; Identification of research gaps and outcome measure heterogeneity

Related stories