This retrospective study evaluated whether clinical outcomes differed between connective tissue graft (CTG) and allogeneic solvent-dehydrated acellular dermal matrix (ADM) for treating multiple gingival recessions associated with non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using partial restoration and the double-vestibular incision subperiosteal tunnel access (double-VISTA) technique....
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
✦ Clinical Takeaway ✦
No actionable change — this article is not relevant to audiology practice.
✦ Why It Matters ✦
This article does not matter to the audiology field; it is a dental/periodontal surgery study with no hearing-related content.
✦ Key Points ✦
- 01Retrospective dental study comparing connective tissue graft vs. acellular dermal matrix.
- 02Addresses gingival (gum) recession combined with non-carious cervical lesions.
- 03No audiology, hearing, or vestibular relevance whatsoever.
- 04Published in a periodontics/dental journal, not an audiology outlet.
✦ Research metadata ✦
- PMID
- 42670677
- DOI
- 10.1002/jper.70190.
- Journal
- Journal of Periodontology
- Publication type
- research_article
- Evidence level
- 4
- Population
- Dental patients with multiple gingival recessions and non-carious cervical lesions
- Intervention
- Double-VISTA technique with connective tissue graft
- Comparator
- Double-VISTA technique with acellular dermal matrix
Primary outcomes
Gingival recession coverage; Treatment success rate