Blog · Cochlear implants← The news desk

✦ The Dispatch

Referring adults for cochlear implants: The new 60/70 rule

A dispatch from Hearing Practitioner Australia — filed

Female presenter at a congress podium beside a slide titled "Review of the 60/60 guideline. Why?" comparing US and Australian CI candidacy criteria.
✦ PlateFemale presenter at a congress podium beside a slide titled "Review of the 60/60 guideline. Why?" comparing US and Australian CI candidacy criteria.

Perth audiologist Dr Cathy Sucher presenting on the new 60/70 rule for cochlear implant referral at the 26th ACAud inc. HAASA Congress. Image: Prime Creative Media. When should hearing care practitioners refer adults for cochlear implant evaluation? Dr ROB EIKELBOOM and Dr CATHY SUCHER detail a simple Australian guide....

Continue reading at Hearing Practitioner Australia

✦ The floor

Discussion

Signed responses from readers of the wire.

Clinical Takeaway

Australian audiologists and hearing practitioners should be aware of the proposed 60/70 referral rule as a locally adapted alternative to the US-derived 60/60 rule, but this is congress-presented expert opinion — await formal published guidelines before changing referral thresholds.

Why It Matters

Updating cochlear implant referral criteria to reflect Australian speech-testing practices and broader candidacy (including asymmetric and single-sided deafness) could meaningfully reduce under-referral of adults who would benefit from implantation.

Key Points
  1. 01The 60/70 rule is proposed as an Australian adaptation of the US-origin 60/60 cochlear implant referral guideline.
  2. 02The original 60/60 rule was based on the better-hearing ear and unaided word scores — metrics not standard in Australian clinics.
  3. 03Australian practice uses phoneme-correct scoring and evaluates each ear separately, requiring a locally calibrated threshold.
  4. 04The new rule also aims to capture broader candidacy, including asymmetric hearing loss and single-sided deafness (SSD).
  5. 05The proposal was presented at the 26th ACAud inc. HAASA Congress by Dr Cathy Sucher and Dr Rob Eikelboom — not yet peer-reviewed.
Claims & Evidence

The original US 60/60 rule does not perfectly fit Australian cochlear implant candidacy practice due to differences in speech test scoring and ear-assessment conventions.

opinionpartially supported

Australian clinics typically score phonemes correct (rather than whole words) and assess each ear separately for CI candidacy.

opinionpartially supported

The 60/70 rule broadens cochlear implant candidacy criteria to include asymmetric hearing loss and single-sided deafness.

opinionunclear
Related stories