OBJECTIVES: To synthesize evidence on attrition across the adult cochlear implant care pathway by identifying (1) stages at which adults disengage or experience delay and (2) patient-, provider-, and system-level factors associated with attrition at each stage. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library.
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
Clinics should audit their cochlear implant care pathways for stage-specific dropout points, as this review identifies actionable patient- and provider-level barriers that could be addressed to improve access and completion rates.
Reducing attrition across the cochlear implant care pathway is critical to ensuring that eligible adults with severe hearing loss actually receive life-changing treatment, addressing a well-documented gap between candidacy and implantation.
- 01Scoping review identifies where and why adult patients disengage from the cochlear implant care pathway.
- 02Both patient-level factors (e.g., cost, awareness, motivation) and provider-level factors (e.g., referral delays, wait times) drive attrition.
- 03Dropout occurs at multiple distinct stages: referral, evaluation, candidacy determination, surgical scheduling, and follow-up.
- 04Findings have direct implications for improving access and reducing inequities in cochlear implant uptake.
- 05Published in Otology & Neurotology as a scoping review synthesizing existing evidence.
Patient attrition and delay occur at multiple distinct stages of the adult cochlear implant care pathway.
studysupportedBoth patient- and provider-level factors contribute to disengagement from cochlear implant care.
studysupported- PMID
- 42679062
- DOI
- 10.1097/MAO.0000000000005050.
- Journal
- Otology & Neurotology
- Publication type
- scoping_review
- Evidence level
- na
- Population
- Adults undergoing or eligible for cochlear implantation
- Intervention
- Scoping review of attrition factors across cochlear implant care pathway stages
Primary outcomes
Stage-specific patient attrition rates; Patient-level factors driving disengagement; Provider-level factors driving disengagement