OBJECTIVES: To precisely determine the correlation between subjective and objective balance indicators among older adults having experienced falls.
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
Audiologists and vestibular specialists conducting fall-risk assessments in older adults should note the potential gap between how patients rate their own balance and what objective tests reveal, though clinical protocol changes require replication in larger studies.
Clarifying the relationship between subjective and objective balance measures in older fallers could improve screening efficiency and guide more targeted vestibular rehabilitation referrals.
- 01Cross-sectional study comparing subjective balance self-ratings with objective balance test scores in older adults with fall history.
- 02Addresses a gap: patients and clinicians may perceive balance ability differently.
- 03Published in the Journal of Pakistan Medical Association 2026.
- 04Findings relevant to fall-risk screening protocols in geriatric audiology and vestibular rehabilitation.
- 05Cross-sectional design limits causal interpretation; longitudinal data needed.
There is a measurable correlation between subjective balance self-reports and objective balance test results in older adults who have fallen.
studyunclear- PMID
- 42703107
- DOI
- 10.47391/JPMA.22176.
- Journal
- Journal of Pakistan Medical Association
- Publication type
- research_article
- Evidence level
- 3
- Population
- Older adults who have experienced falls
- Intervention
- Comparison of subjective and objective balance indicators
- Comparator
- Subjective balance measures vs. objective balance measures
Primary outcomes
Correlation between subjective balance self-ratings and objective balance test scores in older adult fallers