Journal article · Cochlear implants← The news desk

✦ The Dispatch

Impact of visual mouth image presentation on speech perception in noise in normal hearing subjects and cochlear implant users

A dispatch from PubMed — filed

This study investigated the impact of visual speech cues on speech perception in noise and subjective listening effort in cochlear implant (CI) users compared with normal-hearing (NH) individuals. Furthermore, the study compared visual information presented either by a computer-generated avatar or by video recordings of a real speaker....

Continue reading at PubMed

✦ The floor

Discussion

Signed responses from readers of the wire.

Clinical Takeaway

Audiologists counselling cochlear implant users should be aware that even partial visual cues (mouth images alone) may reduce listening effort and improve speech understanding in noise, supporting the value of audiovisual rehabilitation strategies.

Why It Matters

Quantifying the benefit of visual mouth cues for cochlear implant users supports evidence-based counselling on audiovisual communication strategies and the potential role of visual training in auditory rehabilitation.

Key Points
  1. 01Visual mouth-image cues were tested for their effect on speech perception in noise in two groups.
  2. 02Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing subjects were directly compared.
  3. 03Both speech intelligibility and listening effort (cognitive load) were measured as outcomes.
  4. 04Published in PLoS ONE (2026); open-access methodology allows replication.
  5. 05Findings have direct implications for audiovisual rehabilitation counselling for cochlear implant recipients.
Claims & Evidence

Visual mouth-image cues improve speech perception in noise for cochlear implant users compared to audio-only conditions.

studypartially supported

Visual mouth-image cues reduce listening effort in cochlear implant users during noisy listening tasks.

studypartially supported

The benefit of visual mouth cues differs between cochlear implant users and normal-hearing individuals.

studyunclear
Research metadata
PMID
42726743
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0357983.
Journal
PLoS ONE
Publication type
research_article
Evidence level
2b
Population
Cochlear implant users and normal-hearing adults
Intervention
Visual mouth-image cue presentation during speech-in-noise tasks
Comparator
Audio-only speech-in-noise condition; normal-hearing subjects as reference group

Primary outcomes

Speech perception in noise (intelligibility scores); Listening effort

Related stories