To compare hearing preservation (HP) outcomes between lateral wall (LW) and perimodiolar (PM) cochlear implant electrode arrays. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and ScienceDirect for studies published between January 2018 and April 2025.
Cochlear implant surgeons and audiologists should review this meta-analysis when counseling candidates about electrode array choice for hearing preservation; findings may refine electrode selection protocols for patients with residual hearing.
Preserving residual acoustic hearing during cochlear implantation is increasingly prioritized, and a definitive comparative evidence base for electrode array type directly influences surgical and programming decisions.
- 01Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing lateral wall vs. perimodiolar electrode arrays for hearing preservation.
- 02Databases searched: PubMed, Embase, and Scopus.
- 03Hearing preservation is a key outcome given the trend toward combined electric-acoustic stimulation.
- 04Results may guide electrode selection in patients with residual low-frequency hearing.
- 05Published in Otology & Neurotology (doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004953).
Lateral wall and perimodiolar electrode arrays differ in hearing preservation outcomes in cochlear implantation.
studypartially supported- PMID
- 42225143
- DOI
- 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004953.
- Journal
- Otology & Neurotology
- Publication type
- meta_analysis
- Evidence level
- 1a
- Population
- Cochlear implant recipients with residual hearing enrolled in prior studies
- Intervention
- Lateral wall cochlear implant electrode arrays
- Comparator
- Perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays
Primary outcomes
Hearing preservation post-cochlear implantation