By individualizing speech-in-noise level, one can aim to compare physiological responses near a comparable recognition level across listeners with different hearing abilities. We examined whether the aim was realized and whether pupil diameter, skin conductance, and photoplethysmography-derived heartrate provided usable responses during sentence recognition....
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
No actionable clinical change — this is a foundational physiological study; findings may eventually support objective measures of listening effort but are not yet ready to inform clinical practice.
Identifying reliable physiological markers of listening effort during speech-in-noise tasks could one day enable objective, non-self-reported assessment of hearing difficulty, benefiting both diagnostics and hearing aid fitting.
- 01Measured multiple physiological signals simultaneously during a speech-in-noise (understanding speech in a noisy room) task.
- 02Testing was conducted at each listener's individualized speech-in-noise threshold — the difficulty level tailored to each person.
- 03Participants had varying levels of hearing ability, enabling comparison across hearing profiles.
- 04Explores physiological correlates of listening effort, a growing area of audiology research.
- 05Multimodal approach (combining several body measures) is the key methodological contribution.
Multimodal physiological responses differ during sentence recognition at individualized speech-in-noise thresholds across listeners with varying hearing abilities.
studyunclear- PMID
- 42944475
- DOI
- 10.3390/s26206613.
- Journal
- Sensors
- Publication type
- research_article
- Evidence level
- 2b
- Population
- Listeners with varying hearing abilities (normal hearing and hearing impaired adults)
- Intervention
- Sentence recognition task at individualized speech-in-noise thresholds with multimodal physiological monitoring
- Comparator
- Listeners with varying hearing abilities serving as within-study comparison groups
Primary outcomes
Multimodal physiological response patterns during speech-in-noise sentence recognition; Differences in physiological signals across hearing ability groups