The transition to fifth- and sixth-generation fighter aircraft is increasing the psychophysiological demands placed on military aircrew. Next-generation fast-jet operations combine sustained and repetitive high-G loading; intermittent hypoxia, hyperoxia, and hypobaria associated with unexplained physiological episodes; prolonged single-seat missions; advanced helmet-mounted displays; acoustic and thermal stress; and...
✦ The floor
Discussion
Signed responses from readers of the wire.
No actionable change for audiologists; this military aviation physiology review has no direct bearing on routine audiology practice.
While peripheral to audiology, the review highlights noise- and acceleration-induced physiological stressors—including hearing and vestibular risks—relevant to occupational audiologists and researchers working with military populations.
- 01Reviews psychophysiological stressors on aircrew flying 5th- and 6th-generation fighter aircraft.
- 02Covers health risks including noise exposure, G-force effects, hypoxia, and cognitive load.
- 03Examines performance factors and readiness in extreme aviation environments.
- 04Discusses countermeasures to mitigate health and performance degradation.
- 05Published in Frontiers in Physiology as a broad narrative or scoping review.
Next-generation fighter aircraft impose psychophysiological stressors that threaten pilot health, readiness, and performance.
studypartially supportedCountermeasures exist that can mitigate the health and performance risks associated with advanced fighter aviation.
studypartially supported- PMID
- 42835368
- DOI
- 10.3389/fphys.2026.1920799.
- Journal
- Frontiers in Physiology
- Publication type
- review
- Evidence level
- 5
- Population
- Military aircrew operating fifth- and sixth-generation fighter aircraft
- Intervention
- Review of psychophysiological stressors, health risks, and countermeasures in advanced fighter aviation
Primary outcomes
Psychophysiological stressor characterisation in advanced fighter aircrew; Health and performance risk factors; Effectiveness of countermeasures